When y’all see a sharp rise (or fall) in the graph followed immediately by a sharp fall (or rise), it indicates that the first player blundered and the second player missed the response. There are several in this game, showing that both players didn’t see as deeply into the possibilities as Houdini’s analysis.
The majority of my tactical missteps occur in the early middlegame after the pieces are fully deployed. The level of my tactical problems will be increased to address this problem, trading off complexity for quantity. On the plus side, the endgame technique was reasonable for the level of play.
The variations and move evaluations are Houdini’s (1.5 32-bit), diagnosed with ‘Scid vs PC’ at 15 seconds per ply and a 0.6 error threshold. The verbal comments are my thoughts during the game and my interpretations of the analysis provided by Houdini. The score chart is at the bottom of this entry.
FEN "8/8/8/8/1k6/4p1P1/6P1/6K1 w - - 0 1